There Goes Grandma!

">
hold on...what happened to grandma?  was that paul ryan who pushed my grandma off a cliff?  sure looks like it!  god damn these god-damned republicans. the republicans are ALWAYS the party of scum and treason AND they will push anybody's grandma off a cliff if they think the can get away with it!

what's the real difference between republicans and your local crack dealer?  what?  they're mostly WHITE PEOPLE?  well...who's got the biggest stakes in the game?

The New U.S.-Israel Policy: TOUGH LOVE!

Obama was too ‘nuanced’ in his enunciation of this ‘new’ Israeli policy.  Obama said that Israel should go back to its 1967 borders with ‘swaps’ in his State Dept. speech.  In his speech to AIPAC he said that the ‘swaps’ mean that the 1967 borders aren’t the borders of   June 10, 1967.  

This is another Obama, A and ¬A! 

So, let me make it real simple for Israel, the Palestinians, and the rest of the world.

First, to Israel:  You are a rich high tech nuclear armed country with one of the world’s best military and intelligence organizations.  YOU CAN STAND ON YOUR OWN TWO FEET!  However, if you still want to get welfare from the US, YOU HAD DAMN WELL BETTER START DOING WHAT WE TELL YOU TO DO!!!!!!!!!!!!!  AND WHAT WE’RE TELLING YOU TO DO IS:  GO BACK TO YOUR PRE-June 10, 1967 BORDERS!  If you don’t want to, well…good luck, we know you’ll land on your feet!

Second, to Palestinians:  You should have a fully sovereign country with the borders as they were before the end of the ‘Six-Day War’ if you are going to grant ‘the right of return’ as the Israelis do.  Being sovereign means you can ‘arm up’ as much as the Israelis do!  Why should Israel have nukes and your state be de-militarized?  (Another Obama, A and ¬A, i.e., sovereign and ¬sovereign!)  If you accept the current borders, then you are the new Amerikan Indians, pushed onto ‘the Rez’.  Compare the two maps.

Hey, Pals, see the similarity?

Third, to the rest of the world:  To all you dictators out there, who were buddy-buddy with former (right-wing) US administrations:  YOU ARE NOT THIS ADMINISTRATION’S BUDDIES!  So, you better free your people and become democracies OR STARTING RUNNING!

That’s it.  Clear it up any for you?

View to a Kill 3

(This is becoming a veritable franchise!)

Obama promised us a picture of the bullet riddled head of Osama bin Landen.  Did he think such a picture would be proof of the death of bin Laden?  Hard to say.  Obama rescinded the offer almost immediately after he made it.  Obama may be the smartest guy in the White House since Richard Nixxon.

However, for the rest of us (of ordinary endowments) living in the age of Photoshop, a picture is no proof of anything.  The same, of course, goes for sound recordings, film, video, and any other medium of communication.  As far as testimonials go, they’ve been known to be completely worthless ever since people became aware of how the repetition of a story by different story tellers becomes ever more altered on each telling.

If Obama threw Osama into the sea, then the least ‘fakeable’ artifact, that could have been used to prove that the SEAL mission took place in the (ever changing) way the official narrative describes, has been lost. 

That being the case:  nobody’s description of events is any more credible than anybody else’s!  (Don’t ask me to trust you, I don’t even know you.)

Further, explanations coming from the military and the intelligence communities are the LEAST credible as these communities are trained, sworn, and very well paid to cover up the ‘reality’ of all sorts of events and situations and things.  Their very raison d’être rules out their ever giving a complete and truthful account of any efforts they undertake.  Then, there’s the matter of ‘psychological warfare’ or ‘psyops’ (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_warfare).  And last, but not least, information in the intel communities is ‘compartmented’ (on a ‘need to know’ basis) so that nobody but a handful of ‘people’ at the tops of the various agencies and contracting corporations know ‘the whole story’ (so that they may be able to manipulate—for a time—our general understanding history).  I almost wrote, “our common understanding of history”, until I realized (a second later) that the mil-intel-corporate community’s understanding of history is replete with testimonials of their efforts and actions (including ‘counter-intelligence’ and 'psyops') while the history known to those outside of that community has those testimonials redacted!

So, here we all are.  All of us, freed from the truth by the secrecy and lies of our, so called, leaders! 

(Oh, by the way, never let anyone in the mil-intel-police-corporate community put you ‘on the line’ to ‘tell the truth’.  What could that even mean in their world where they manufacture ‘the truth’ as part of their secret business!  Compelling us to ‘tell the truth’ is just a form of intimidation or ‘sick kicks’!  Just remember:  whatever you think ‘the truth’ is, it is probably something else and the mil-intel-police-corporate community can make anything they want out of what you think!  The police and the courts do it to ‘inner city youth’ on a routine basis with barely a whimper from the press or ‘the general public’-- http://www.ehow.com/info_8400307_reid-american-criminal-investigation-process.html.)

So, let me proffer a conjecture.

I find it absolutely non-credible that the CIA, NSA, and Mil Intel would go to all the trouble and effort they assert they put into finding Osama (including moving in next door) just to kill Osama! 

Could the president and the mil-intel ‘leadership’ be so STUPID as to ORDER a kill for the one guy who could:   (a) explain what Al-Qaeda is currently ‘cooking up’, (b) describe Al-Qaeda’s whole communications network, (c) describe all of the ‘up and coming’ talent that’s been recruited over that last few years, (d) explain how he and his associates pulled off 911, and LAST BUT NOT LEAST:  (e) explain the relationship between Al-Qaeda and Pakistan’s ISI (especially since we seem to be itching to go to war with Pakistan over this question)?

Now, let’s say the president and the mil-intel ‘leadership’ weren’t so stupid and ordered the CIA/SEAL team to capture Osama.  Then the question becomes:  was Team 6 (or whoever) so incompetent that they FUBAR’d the mission and killed Osama (and the wife he threw at them)?  And, if the CIA/SEAL team FUBAR’d the mission, wouldn’t they cover it up?  And even if they didn’t, wouldn’t the so called, leaders, cover it up?

So, PrezO, which is it?  You or Team whoever?  Or both?  Is it stupidity or just incompetence requiring a cover up?

Or…are you lying??? 

It would be contradictory to ask you to ‘tell the truth’, given what I wrote above.  So, I’ll just leave things at this question.

However, guess what:

I DON’T BELIEVE ANYONE FUBAR’d! 

Osama simply got tired of being sidelined and imprisoned by his associates, who had turned against him, and rejected his suggestions for future operations.  He used his couriers to make an arrangement with the CIA to ‘spring’ him and cover up the fact.  His family will probably get some of that $25M bounty.  (We’ll have to keep an eye on how well they live in the future.)

While the SEALS’ mouths are sealed and the CIA is ‘completely innocent always’ and NSA has ‘no such awareness’, Obama knows (something), and it’s eating at his ‘liberal soul, brother’ to tell the truth!  (Wait a minute…that again!  Why does this keep coming up??)  On second thought, given PrezO’s success record at keeping his campaign promises…maybe not so much.

Whatever…the easiest conjecture is that this lie will eat at the heart of the next Obama administration, just as the Kennedy assassination did Johnson’s and Watergate did Nixon’s.  And, roughly around the same time that historians find out that Oswald didn’t kill Kennedy (by himself, at least), they’ll find that Osama bin Laden died an older man under WITSEC somewhere in the Nevada desert and got a proper burial for his part in bringing down Al-Qaeda.

View To A Kill 2

Oh, here we go (again)!  

< http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0511/54162.html > 

So now we’re told an unarmed bin Laden was killed while ‘resist’n’.  I’ve heard that one before. (When did Osama become a black man?)  Oh, well.  Let’s see, Carney also said there’re no pictures of the burial at sea we can see.  They’ve given us a lot of information in haste.  (Which means the story will change again…and again…and again…). 

A reporter asked how bin Laden resisted? 

I’d sure like to have seen an unarmed old man with kidney problems 

<http://www.medcitynews.com/2011/05/bin-laden-didnt-have-kidney-disease-morning-read/>

resisting a CIA/SEAL team, 

hand to hand, so effectively that they got scared and had to blow him away!  Osama must have really kicked some butt!

Quite obviously, they’d have kept him around to find out who in the ISI was ‘putting him up’ so ‘large’.  Gentle reader, this story is 100% U.S. BS (just like the beef).  Speaking of which:  ‘Where’s the beef?’

Where’s my head????????? 

Prez O promised me a head!!!!!!!!  I want my head!!  I don’t care how grizzly it is (I’ve gotten use to the grizzly moma).  Oh, I know what happened to that head!  

Who does O think he is, Sam Peckinpah?

Bring me my damn head!   Bring me the head of Alfredo bin Laden! 

A View To A Kill

Obama:  five. 

Osama:  3,000. 

FIVE wins!

But wait!  Where’s the proof of this ‘view to a kill’?

What about those of us without a TS/SCI full field CIA/NSA POLY and program read-on?  What do we get to see?  Any digital video?  (Not that this is proof, as it could easily be faked.)  How about some blurry ‘point and shoot’ digital photographs?  (Again, not proof for the above reason.)  Sound samples?  Anything?

Is Prez O asking us to simply believe we grabbed Osama and dumped his body in the sea?  Who does O think he is?  Dexter?

How do we know for sure that the SEALs didn’t just deliver flowers and candy and escort Osama back to Saudi Arabia?  (Like the shrub did for the Osama’s relatives the day after 911. < http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/Sky-News-Archive/Article/200806412758358 >)  How do we know Osama didn’t single handedly shoot down that helicopter, kill the whole CIA/SEAL team,  and then ride off on a horse as he did from Afghanistan?  < http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1382011/Bin-Ladens-great-escape-How-worlds-wanted-man-fools-elite-troops-whod-trapped-mountain-lair.html >

What sort of ‘dog-and-pony show’ are we going to get?  It had better be as good as the Stanley Kubrick Apollo Moonwalk movies!

< http://news.discovery.com/space/faked-moon-landings-and-kubricks-the-shining.html >

My military source, Major Max Overkill, tells me that there’s no way ‘we’ would have just busted down the hideout and killed Osama.  We would have grabbed him and made him participate in some recreational water boarding.  (No worse than a good hazing, after all.)  He would have then happily volunteered the locations of all of the rest of his lieutenants. Max also explains that even if he was killed, the agency would have (at least) kept a small souvenir for its collection (just like our troops do < http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1370758/Shocking-video-shows-U-S-troops-cheering-airstrike-blows-Afghan-civilians.html >).  More likely, they would have put him on ice in the basement of the CIA (if there was enough left).

I don’t know what O’s up to (well…besides getting reelected), but I would beseech him to please stop with this tired old trope of asking us to just believe whatever some GovCorp official says.  If GovCorp can't trust US, why should we trust them?  Let’s establish a new policy:  if GovCorp can’t PROVE what it has to say, don’t even bother us with it!  Historians can dig the truth out of whatever records are left behind after we’ve gotten whatever we’ve got coming, if and when, al-Qaida decides to pull off some operation and succeeds at it (with or without Osama and Obama).